Home for Thanksgiving

  Opted to spend Thanksgiving with my brother and sis-in-law's family this year... last year, had my little princess and we made the trip together.  Although I was "in town" for a reunion this summer, haven't driven through the neighborhood in some time.

Drove down the "main drag" where I grew up.  Many empty store fronts... seems the only businesses that haven't changed are the cleaners!!  The state Motor Vehicles HQ is in my home town... they built a new building for that... the old one has been transformed into a rickety government office building.

The farm where I had my first job appears exactly the same (still needs a coat of paint!)... the garden shop where my bro and I sold cactuses (our first business) is still there, with the same name, though I understand they went bankrupt in the '90's and operate under new management.

Reflecting that this town had nothing for my MBA (short of falling in on one of the big insurance companies)... Mom and Dad aren't here any longer and our old home is painted cream (for shame!)... the tree fort must have been torn down years ago.

Great to see my brother and his family!

Write a book

  Are you thinking about writing a book?  Should you be thinking about writing a book?

Earlier this week, Brister's "Shotgunning:  The Art and Science," arrived.  This weekend, the "Countdown Deal" for my book (http://www.amazon.com/Citizens-Guide-Marksmanship-Pete-Godston/dp/1499509707/ref=sr_1_1_title_1_pap?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1406464701&sr=1-1&keywords=godston which includes a section on shotguns) ends.  My book is a practical guide on rifle, pistol and shotgun with a bit of theology and Constitutional law thrown in: some time spent reading this weekend convinces me I have far less expertise than Bob Brister regarding shotguns.

Of course, I have spent more time in my life helping improve efficiency in organizations, whether as a hands on manager (mostly Army experience, some commercial), developing a change management practice for consulting organizations, or helping organizations "opt in" on the services and/or products my employer brings to market.

Do you have a sophisticated view of some section of the world?  A unique perspective to offer?  A unique and interesting voice?

What about the US Defense Department and our Intelligence Community?  Our nation has become exceptional at fighting platoon and squad sized conflicts in places like Afghanistan and Iraq.  Tools and processes for understanding key details about those conflicts seem to drive investments today.  While financial systems for capturing and understanding metrics have been in place for many years, and many are in sore need of tech/data tracking refresh, even after refresh these systems aren't very good at helping effectiveness in the squad fight.

Deciding which book to write, once you have decided to write one, is similar to any product or service development decision:  where does expertise meet market need?  And, as my Harvard Business School competition and strategy professor always used to say, "is this a profitable business?"  Or, in the words of the famous, perhaps infamous, Jack Welch, outsized CEO of General Electric during that company's heyday (sorry Jeff http://seekingalpha.com/article/2339495-can-microsofts-satya-nadella-learn-anything-from-ges-jeff-immelt, still true at the moment), "if you aren't #1 or #2 in a business, get out."

Where does your expertise meet market need?  James Altucher (see http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2012/06/the-choose-yourself-era-how-to-sell-300000-books/ ) would probably say you shouldn't spend too much time thinking about this (better get going with writing your book, and evolve your product over time, with your next book, or the one after that), but it  doesn't hurt to give those dynamics some thought before you approach a book project.

For me, selling complex products and services to large, complex organizations, is probably my core expertise.  Perhaps I will continue to focus on doing this job (rather than writing about it).  Rather than a tome about the Ukraine (where my rusty Russian language skills and rudimentary understanding of natural gas economics might add some value), perhaps my next book will stray toward business (where I received my masters from Harvard some twenty years ago and have mostly worked since then...).  Thoughts?

Vaclav Havel

  Brendan Eich, CEO of Mozilla, was forced to step down from Mozilla a few couple months ago, because of his views about same sex marriage.  But that isn't what this post is about.  It's about Vaclav Havel, whose 1978 essay about dissent is quoted in a Federalist.com posting about same sex marriage:

“The post-totalitarian system demands conformity, uniformity, and discipline,” Havel wrote, using the term he preferred over “dictatorship” for the complex system of social control experienced in Czechoslovakia. We also have a system that is demanding conformity, uniformity and discipline — it’s not just about marriage law, to be honest. It’s really about something much bigger — crushing the belief that the sexes are distinct in deep and meaningful ways that contribute to human flourishing. Obviously marriage law plays a role here — recent court rulings have asserted that the sexes are interchangeable when it comes to marriage. That’s only possible if they’re not distinct in deep and meaningful ways. But the push to change marriage laws is just one part of a larger project to change our understanding of sexual distinctions. See, for example,the 50 genders of Facebook or the refusal to understand how women’s distinct career choices explain virtually all of the supposed pay gap that partisans exploit for political gain....

So what is the difference between marriage and other relationships? There’s no question marriage has been treated dramatically differently than other relationships by governments and society. Why? Is it that it features a more vibrant or emotional connection? Or is there some feature that is a difference in kind – that marks it out as something that ought to be socially structured? We usually don’t want government in our other relationships, right? So why is marriage singled out throughout all time and human history as a different type of recognized relationship?

Well, what singled it out was that sex was involved. Sex. Knocking boots. The bump and grind. Dancing in the sheets. Making the beast with two backs. Doing the cha-cha. And so on and so forth. And why does that matter? Well, there’s precisely one bodily system for which each of us only has half of the system. It’s the one that involves sex between one man and one woman. It’s with respect to that system that the unit is the mated pair. In that system, it’s not just a relationship that is the union of minds, wills or important friendships. It’s the literal union of bodies. In sexual congress, in intercourse between a man and a woman, you are literally coordinated to a single bodily end...

Vaclav Havel was a dissident, poet and eventual president of Czechoslavakia.  He lived under Communism and eventually helped overthrow it.  A worthy author to quote....

This post was written for The Federalist... Molly Hemingway.  You can read the complete posting here:  http://thefederalist.com/2014/04/08/the-rise-of-the-same-sex-marriage-dissidents/

Geography and eWISEinc LLC

   Maps, Maps, Maps.

One of the reasons for joining AAA used to be a package of maps and instructions they would send you to help you plan long trips.  Today's Google Maps solves that problem... though AAA will still help you if your car breaks down or you meet someone in the Target parking lot who locked her baby in the car with the keys (happened to me this week).

I took a shortcut home from school one day when I was 8... and got pretty lost.  My second foray with a long trip was in Junior High School, the first of four bike trips from Connecticut to New Hampshire.  We planned which route to take and where to stay each night.  Every summer my brother, several friends and/or I took versions of that bike trip, although we never all rode and it was never the same group (injuries got in the way).

Army ROTC helped me improve my map skills, culminating in my graduation from Ranger school in 1984...  in addition to a challenging land navigation course in the "City phase," we could be questioned at any time on a patrol to point out our location on a map with the end of a blade of grass.  Mind you, the challenge could come in the middle of a swamp in 20-degree weather after you had been carrying a 70 pound ruck on 3 hours sleep and two skimpy meals for five weeks.  My map skills had improved significantly.

In my first job in the Army as a Regular Army Officer, we deployed an early version of that geographic system on your phone.  The system was 2 1/2 feet square and let you add data with a cumbersome and slow interface.  Although I had done statistical analysis as part of my thesis, winning the Julius Turner Prize as an undergraduate, my interactions with this new "GIS" lit a light bulb for me:  computers are going to dramatically change the way we interact with the world and the way we lead organizations.

After obtaining my Harvard MBA, I interacted with the "Catalyst" team at Sun Microsystems.  One of the marketing managers was responsible for working with independent software vendors that built GIS systems with UNIX.  In those days, ESRI and MAPINFO were the two main competitors.

A couple years ago I led Lockheed Martin's capture team on the Military Terrain III response.  The organization responsible for this geographic data Request for Proposal was the Army Geospatial Center, nominally part of the Army's Corps of Engineers, although the National Geospatial Center has that mission for the government as a whole.  Sadly, the Army cancelled that acquisition a bit over a month  ago... posting several small business set-asides to fill the gap (funding permitting).

Since I'm a small business, I'm investigating.  Many US Armed Forces weapons systems are dependent on geographic systems to operate.  Would be intriguing to help!

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley!

  Fellow Republican...

In 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley legislation became the law of the land.  This legislation fundamentally changed the way companies large and small perform accounting, including a very important provision about the way we account for stock options.  The voice track for the legislation (at least the stock option part of it) was that many people lost alot of money because of internet-bubble-company-hype and, oh by the way, top leadership of Corporate America is making too much money via stock options.

Make no mistake.  This legislation passed because rich people lost lots of money investing in internet start-ups.  They should know better.  Rich people also typically make lots of money in the stock market, so I guess it's ok when they have a losing streak every once in a while.  Think of the Titanic protagonist (Rose's fiance) who jumped out of a tall building after he lost his fortune... that guy deserved it, right?

Top leadership of Corporate America will always be hideously well paid... that is hard to fight, and I'm not sure we should legislate against it.  Some approaches to compensation would appear to be appropriately labeled theft, and people who thereby benefit should face criminal prosecution.  But I would argue that stock options isn't one of the "corporate theft" challenges.

Sarbanes Oxley is great for the accounting profession and terrible for low level start-up employees, who no longer receive generous option packages.   Oh, sure... the few start-ups backed with inside money and powerful connections that drive momentum... those start-ups grant enough options for more than the few senior exec's to get rich.  But the underdog start-up can't take care of it's loyal employees the way it once could.

Sarbanes Oxley is criminal.  It is helping the very, very rich continue to accumulate more and more of the earth's resources.  It is stopping thousands of "average Joe/Josephina's" from getting rich when their smart, hard working company grows exponentially and goes public.  And it may be blocking the most important innovators from monetizing their smart ideas (before Google, Microsoft, or some other reincarnation of IBM steals those ideas and implements them... see also Google/Silicon Valley campaign against patent and copyright legislation;)

Ok.  That wasn't very nice.  Sorry Bill Gates and Eric Schmidt, et al.  But you get my gist.  Repeal Sarbanes Oxley!!!  I'm tired of hearing people yell about repealing Obamacare....

Grenada

  Believe I was sitting on the ground preparing for a road march when I heard about Grenada.  The Rangers jumped in at several hundred feet without reserve 'chutes (not enough time to deploy if you'd needed it, evidently).  The American students on the island were rapidly located and secured.  All the real fighting was supposedly complete when the 82d Airborne got to the island.

Many of my colleagues were angry... missed a chance in a lifetime to do a combat jump, get the combat shoulder scroll.  Who knew the 2d Armored Cavalry would demonstrate the prowess of a well trained crew and the M1 tank on the sands of Iraq?  At the time, Communism was a vital doctrine and my military didn't know the definition of fatwa, much less the ramifications of one from a respected cleric (or even a high-born thug).

Times change.  After a decade in the Middle East, our military may appreciate a vacation... while we await the next great challenge...  Would be good to see just people in charge in Afghanistan when we leave... much blood has been shed working with our brothers (and sisters) to seek improvements.

Handley on Benghazi

  This isn't my text, but it poignantly explains the shock and indignation most military veterans (still serving or not) feel about the recent Benghazi incident and associated USG posturing.  The words were written by a retired AF Colonel, Phil Handley, and brought to my attention via "Pops," my Dad, a former AF pilot himself.

Colonel Phil "Hands" Handley is credited with the highest speed air-to-air gun kill in the history of aerial combat. He flew operationally for all but 11 months of a 26-year career, in aircraft such as the F-86 Sabre, F-15 Eagle, and the C-130A Hercules. Additionally, he flew 275 combat missions during two tours in Southeast Asia in the F-4D and F-4E. His awards include 21 Air Medals, 3 Distinguished Flying Crosses, and the Silver Star.  That is a pretty decorated pilot.

Please share your response to what Col. Handley wrote in response to Panetta and Dempsey claims there was no time to send help to Benghazi.
---------------------------------------
Betrayal in Benghazi

             The combat code of the US Military is that we don't abandon our dead or wounded on the battlefield. In US Air Force lingo, fighter pilots don't run off and leave their wingmen. If one of our own is shot down, still alive and not yet in enemy captivity, we will either come to get him or die trying.
             Among America 's fighting forces, the calm, sure knowledge that such an irrevocable bond exists is priceless. Along with individual faith and personal grit, it is a sacred trust that has often sustained hope in the face of terribly long odds.
             The disgraceful abandonment of our Ambassador and those brave ex-SEAL's who fought to their deaths to save others in that compound is nothing short of dereliction-of-duty. Additionally, the patently absurd cover-up scenario that was fabricated in the aftermath was an outright lie in an attempt to shield the President and the Secretary of State from responsibility.
             It has been over eight months since the attack on our compound in Benghazi. The White House strategy, with the aid of a "lap dog" press has been to run out the clock before the truth is forthcoming.
            The recent testimonies of the three "whistle blowers" have reopened the subject and hopefully will lead to exposure and disgrace of those responsible for this embarrassing debacle. It would appear that the most recent firewall which the Administration is counting on is the contention "that there were simply no military assets that could be brought to bear in time to make a difference" mainly due to the unavailability of tanker support for fighter aircraft.
            This is simply Bull Shit, regardless how many supposed "experts” the Administration trot out to make such an assertion.
            The bottom line is that even if the closest asset capable of response was half-way around the world, you don't just sit on your penguin ass and do nothing. The fact is that the closest asset was not half-way around the world, but as near as Aviano Air Base , Italy where two squadrons of F-16Cs are based.
            Consider the following scenario (all times Benghazi local): When Hicks in Tripoli receives a call at 9:40 PM from Ambassador Stevens informing him "Greg, we are under attack!" (his last words), Hicks immediately notifies all agencies and prepares for the immediate initiation of an existing "Emergency Response Plan."
            At AFRICON, General Carter Ham attempts to mount a rescue effort, but is told to "stand down". By 10:30 PM an unarmed drone is overhead the compound and streaming live feed to various "Command and Control Agencies" so everyone watching that feed knew damn well what was going on.
            At 11:30 PM Woods, Doherty and five others leave Tripoli, arriving in Benghazi at 1:30 AM on Wednesday morning, where they hold off the attacking mob from the roof of the compound until they are killed by a mortar direct hit at 4:00 AM.
            So nothing could have been done, eh? Nonsense. If one assumes that tanker support really "was not available" what about this:
            When at 10:00 PM AFRICON alerts the 31st TFW Command Post in Aviano Air Base, Italy of the attack, the Wing Commander orders preparation for the launch of two F-16s and advises the Command Post at NAS Sigonella to prepare for hot pit refueling and quick turn of the jets.  By 11:30 PM, two F-16Cs with drop tanks and each armed with five hundred 20 MM rounds are airborne. Flying at 0.92 mach they will cover the 522 nautical miles directly to NAS Sigonella in 1.08 hours. While in-route, the flight lead is informed of the tactical situation, rules of engagement, and radio frequencies to use.
            The jets depart Sigonella at 1:10 AM with full fuel load and cover the 377 nautical miles directly to Benghazi in 0.8 hours, arriving at 1:50AM which would be 20 minutes after the arrival of Woods, Doherty and their team. Providing that the two F-16s initial pass over the mob, in full afterburner at 200 feet and 550 knots did not stop the attack in its tracks, a few well placed strafing runs on targets of opportunity would assuredly do the trick.
            Were the F-16s fuel state insufficient to return to Sigonelli after jettisoning their external drop tanks, they could easily do so at Tripoli International Airport , only one-half hour away.
            As for those hand-wringing naysayers who would worry about IFR clearances, border crossing authority, collateral damage, landing rights, political correctness and dozens of other reasons not to act -- screw them. It is time our "leadership" get its priorities straight and put America 's interests first.
           The end result would be that Woods and Doherty would be alive. Dozens in the attacking rabble would be rendezvousing with "72 virgins" and a clear message would have been sent to the next worthless P.O.S. terrorist contemplating an attack on Americans that it is not really a good idea to "tug" on Superman's cape.
           Of course all this depends upon a Commander In Chief more concerned with saving the lives of those he put in harm's way than getting his crew rested for a campaign fund raising event in Las Vegas the next day. It also depends upon a Secretary of State who actually understood "What difference did it make?", and a Secretary of Defense who was watching the feed from the drone and understood what the attack consisted of instead of making an immediate response that "One of the military tenants is that you don't commit assets until you fully understand the tactical situation."
           YGBSM! ( You Gotta Be Shittin' Me) Ultimately it comes down to the question of who gave that order to stand down? Whoever that coward turns out to be should be exposed, removed from office, and face criminal charges for dereliction of duty. The combat forces of the United States of America deserve leadership that really does "have their back" when the chips are down.

Phil "Hands" Handley Colonel, USAF (Ret.)